LINK
http://www.koolmuzone.com/2009/03/dawn-images-the-real-face-of-facebook/
Sunday, 29 Mar, 2009 04:30 AM PST
by Hafsa AhsanSource: Dawn ImagesIn the good, old days, the adage was that “Big Brother” is watching. Today, even when there is no security camera in your vicinity, there is someone who has an eye on all your activities — or at least, has the potential to do so.
Every website you visit in cyberspace has the ability to track you and your activities. But those to whom you willingly submit your information, and use it to interact with your friends, have an extremely easy time doing it.
And that is where social networking websites like Facebook come in the picture. You willingly post your personal and professional information, publish all the one hundred and six photos which you took at your annual dinner, and discuss the latest happenings in your college with all your friends. All this while, you may be totally oblivious to where this information is being stored and how it will be used.
The recent brouhaha surrounding Facebook and the way it changed its privacy policy, is by no means the only controversy which has enveloped this particular social networking service. Facebook has been the focus of quite a lot of criticism over the years. And yes, these concerns relate to privacy and privacy only.
In August 2007, Tech Crunch (http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/11/facebook-source-code-leaked/) reported that the source code of Facebook in PHP was published on a blog for all and sundry. As one can imagine, if anyone gets their hands on the source code of Facebook, they have unlimited access to the data of whoever has an account there. Facebook responded promptly, admitting that some of the code was leaked and announcing stricter measures to guard it. But the question remains how the code got public. And if it can go public once, it certainly has the potential to do so again, especially with professional hackers around.
November 2007 saw another Facebook outcry, when a blogger on CA Security Advisor Research Blog (http://community.ca.com/blogs/securityadvisor/archive/2007/11/29/facebook-socialads-going-too-far.aspx ) reported that the social networking website was collecting information about its members’ activities on its affiliate websites. For instance, if you visited an affiliate website of Facebook, information about you and your activities will be collected and sent to Facebook (even if you were not logged into Facebook at the time). This could be information about a game you have played for instance. Moreover, not only would this information go back to Facebook, but it would be published in your Mini-feed as well. Facebook again responded to say that they do not use or retain information about their users on affiliate websites, if the users choose to opt out of this or are logged out of Facebook at the time.
The more recent complaint came on the forefront in February 2009, with regards to the Facebook terms and conditions. Now, it is a general attitude that terms and conditions of any website are hardly, if ever, read thoroughly.
It was very likely that the changes would have gone unnoticed. However, Chris Walters, a blogger for The Consumerist website, spotted the fine print in the new terms and conditions drafted by Facebook, and hence, the storm began.
Basically, the new conditions stated that Facebook would retain the information of its users, even if the users delete it from Facebook. It was also stated that even if users stop using Facebook, their information will be retained. One can only wonder what use this information would be to Facebook — if the user has discontinued using Facebook, or has deleted a photo / wall post, what’s the point in retaining it? As the users, non-users and privacy activists raised this issue, Facebook was pressured into reverting to its previous terms and conditions, something which can be regarded as a victory for privacy conscious individuals.
The interesting point here is that it was pointed out exactly a year ago, in February 2008, that Facebook does not have a proper system in place for users who want to close their account and discontinue Facebook – this gives rise to the suspicion that the account is not actually closed, and the data of the user can be accessed indefinitely by Facebook.
Currently, to counter the wave of criticism, a group has been created by the owner of Facebook entitled “Facebook Bill of Rights and Responsibilities.” Users have been invited to share their views and contribute towards a “new” draft of the terms and conditions, which are written in a reader-friendly language.
In the light of the many incidents mentioned above, what can an average individual do? The one major thing which can be done is to visit the “settings” every once in a while. You will discover quite a few additional checkboxes, pertaining to the use of your information by Facebook. Interestingly, these boxes are checked by default. Hence, you have to be vigilant, keep track of your settings, and uncheck all the extra boxes It is quite normal to expect the Facebook controversies to continue. At the end of the day, it is all about how vigilant you are about your use of social networking websites. Irrespective of how Facebook uses or does not use your information, it is you who has to make sure that you don’t go overboard by uploading private photos or discussing anything which may come back to haunt you. The idea of anyone having a dossier on you is already spooky to the nth degree. Hence, the less that dossier has, the better it is for you and your peace of mind.
Friday, July 17, 2009
Friday, February 13, 2009
George Clooney Dating Fatima Bhutto
LINK 2 : http://a-list.msn.com/default.aspx?cp-searchtext=Fatima%20Bhutto
George Clooney Dating Journalist Fatima Bhutto
Atlanta, GA 2/11/2009 04:44 PM GMT (TransWorldNews)
George Clooney is reportedly dating journalist Fatima Bhutto, the niece of slain Pakistani politician Benazir Bhutto.
Sources tell the National Enquirer the actor is getting serious with Bhutto, 26. “He's still out there with his usual assortment of Hollywood eye-candy hanging from his arm. But George insists those days could be coming to an end if Fatima wants to take their relationship to the next level and spend some serious time with him in the US,” the insider said.
Clooney, who split with Sarah Larson last year, has allegedly been keeping the relationship under wraps. The pair reportedly met at an international conference last year and have been keeping in touch ever since. “Fatima was educated at Columbia University… and knew of his heartthrob reputation, but she didn’t take his advances seriously because she thought their age difference – not to mention where they each lived – would make a serious relationship impractical. But Clooney had courted her by phone and e-mail and arranged to meet her abroad when their schedules allowed it,” the insider adds.
Clooney, 47, has not commented on the reports.
The most eligible bachelor in Hollywood is rumored to be wooing Fatima Bhutto, niece of the late Benazir Bhutto. The two supposedly met at an international conference sometime last year.
George Clooney has had several high-profile hookups before, like with an Angel, a model and a cocktail waitress-turned-reality TV personality. But Bhutto, 26, is largely unknown here. Given her growing buzz, though, she won't remain so for long.
What do we know about this "new girl"?
She's beautiful:Check out these photos of her.
She's smart: She has a B.A. in Middle East studies from Barnard and a master's from the University of London. What did she study?
She's articulate: Bhutto's first book was a collection of poems. She's also a columnist for the News International. Search for her columns.
She's got moxie: Following the assassination of her aunt, people wondered if she would go into politics. Her answer? "I don't believe in birthright politics."
Want more? Here's a link to her Web site.
George Clooney Dating Journalist Fatima Bhutto
Atlanta, GA 2/11/2009 04:44 PM GMT (TransWorldNews)
George Clooney is reportedly dating journalist Fatima Bhutto, the niece of slain Pakistani politician Benazir Bhutto.
Sources tell the National Enquirer the actor is getting serious with Bhutto, 26. “He's still out there with his usual assortment of Hollywood eye-candy hanging from his arm. But George insists those days could be coming to an end if Fatima wants to take their relationship to the next level and spend some serious time with him in the US,” the insider said.
Clooney, who split with Sarah Larson last year, has allegedly been keeping the relationship under wraps. The pair reportedly met at an international conference last year and have been keeping in touch ever since. “Fatima was educated at Columbia University… and knew of his heartthrob reputation, but she didn’t take his advances seriously because she thought their age difference – not to mention where they each lived – would make a serious relationship impractical. But Clooney had courted her by phone and e-mail and arranged to meet her abroad when their schedules allowed it,” the insider adds.
Clooney, 47, has not commented on the reports.
The most eligible bachelor in Hollywood is rumored to be wooing Fatima Bhutto, niece of the late Benazir Bhutto. The two supposedly met at an international conference sometime last year.
George Clooney has had several high-profile hookups before, like with an Angel, a model and a cocktail waitress-turned-reality TV personality. But Bhutto, 26, is largely unknown here. Given her growing buzz, though, she won't remain so for long.
What do we know about this "new girl"?
She's beautiful:Check out these photos of her.
She's smart: She has a B.A. in Middle East studies from Barnard and a master's from the University of London. What did she study?
She's articulate: Bhutto's first book was a collection of poems. She's also a columnist for the News International. Search for her columns.
She's got moxie: Following the assassination of her aunt, people wondered if she would go into politics. Her answer? "I don't believe in birthright politics."
Want more? Here's a link to her Web site.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Is it the time to default
By Mosharraf Zaidi
Pakistan is not going to default, because nobody will let it. That's too bad. Don't let the "economists" scare you. Default sounds like a dark, scary, doomsday scenario. Sovereign default sounds worse, like God's curse itself. It is not. "Sovereign" is the fancy term for country, used by the same loan sharks that milk pensioners to fatten their year-end bonuses (and who brought you Wall Street Meltdown 2008). Sovereign default is simply a country not making its loan repayments on time. It has happened to plenty of countries. They are all still around. Ex-bankers and former IMF employees will never advise Pakistan to default because to do so would be counter-intuitive. It would be like expecting the PPP to undertake land reforms, or the Jamaat-e-Islami to be consistent about anything. Advising Pakistan to default would represent an existential crisis worse than sovereign default. People would be forced to revisit the premise of their entire careers. We can't have that. So instead, we have experts from all around the world wringing their hands, loosening their ties and extolling the virtues of the "bitter pill" of yet another IMF programme. The purpose? To avoid the "dreaded" default, at all costs. Why is default such a "scary" thing, and why do countries go to extraordinary lengths to avoid default? Countries try to avoid default for four reasons. First, countries try to avoid default to save the country's reputation as a borrower in good standing--which means that they want to continue to borrow at rates that are favourable to them. Second, countries try to avoid default to save their ability to participate in international trade freely--which means they fear having sanctions imposed on them for being poor managers of their affairs. Third, countries try to avoid default to protect domestic banking and financial system--which means in essence that they want to protect the rich, because there aren't many poor folks with bank accounts. And finally, the fourth reason countries try to avoid default is to save the government of the day from the disgrace of having defaulted. Eduardo Borensztein and Ugo Panizza published an IMF working paper earlier this month that exposes one of the worst kept secrets in international development. They conclude that among all four of these reasons to avoid default, the most compelling, based on the evidence, is politics. They conclude that "The political consequences of a debt crisis seem to be particularly dire for incumbent governments and finance ministers". In short, governments choose not to default because it is the politically expedient thing to do. The actual economic costs of defaulting, Borenzstein and Panizza conclude, are simply not that high. Moreover, another paper earlier this year (by yet another IMF economist, Ali Alichi), suggests that the only real reason that countries repay the sovereign debt that they owe is to continue to be able to borrow money. In short, Pakistan is trying to avoid defaulting so that the PPP government can stay in power, and so that while it stays in power, it can continue to borrow money. The real question here is: where is all the money going and why does Pakistan need to keep borrowing it? Most of the money is going to debt-servicing and to defence. The traditional response to unsustainable expenditure in Pakistan is to call for a cut in defence spending, while continuing to find a way to pay off Pakistan's loans. No one ever actually explains what they mean by cutting defence spending, which is why the conversation begins with a request to cut the defence budget, meanders into the patriotism of those demanding the cut, and ends with a straight-faced refusal. No one expects Pakistan to compromise its national security, but it is not unreasonable to explore more efficient ways of securing the nation and the national interest. Far from a national conversation about spending priorities however, no one has gone so far as to even suggest a more traditional and hawkish view, for example, that the war on terror being waged by Pakistan's soldiers needs all the financing it can get, and that Pakistan's debtors will have to wait. An even more refreshing case to make would be to suggest that both debt servicing and national security are major drags on current and future generations, and that they represent much lower priorities than building infrastructure, fixing the police and delivering real education. What would a Pakistani government that was committed to those priorities look like? For starters it would stop hiring poorly qualified political workers to stack the deck for future election campaigns. Forget hiring another ten thousand jiyalas as teachers, to ruin another generation of children. Let's face it, Pakistan cannot grow teachers on trees, it doesn't have any teachers. It has to go out and hire the best Indonesian, Turkish, and Korean teachers. It has to bring them to Pakistan and put them to work. Pay them real salaries. Hire the Emiratis that have designed Sheikh Mohammad's infrastructure revolution to do the same thing to Karachi. Then go out and hire every willing CBM, FAST, GIKI, and IBA graduate out there, and make cops and municipal administrators out of them. Take ten of those supercops, give them Blackberrys, night-vision goggles, Humvees and some ammo and put them outside every school. Forget the entourages. Protect the schools. Take the municipal administrators and tell them to get running water to those schools. If there's no well, and no groundwater, teach them how to negotiate deals, so they can buy truckloads of mineral water for the students, and their mothers. Get those kids and their families some clean water. Make sure there are nurses and doctors at each school. Pay every Aga Khan University Medical School graduate twice what they would make as residents at Mount Sinai or Beth Israel. Teach the kids their native languages, drop the grammatically dreadful and aesthetically murderous fake American accents and bring back the Pakistani accent to film, television, radio and to dinner parties. That's the kind of expenditure that would explain indebting future generations of Pakistanis. It would explain deepening the pool of debt that Pakistan is drowning in. It would explain the helplessness currently being feigned by economic and political policy makers. In short, if Pakistan was borrowing money to pay for this kind of a social program, it would be hard to argue against it. Instead, Pakistan is borrowing money to throw it into the same black hole that the money has been going into for at least a generation now. What has Pakistan got to show for almost forty years of sustained debt growth? Illiterate fanatics who can't pronounce the name of God are taking over Swat because the courts don't work. Drug lords and criminals posing as religious vigilantes are taking over NWFP because the cops don't work, can't work, and aren't allowed to work. The water in the taps all over the country is toxic. The teachers at the school can barely read. The ones that can spend more time in Lahore, Peshawar, Quetta and Karachi, at the civil secretariat looking for a transfer, than teaching their students whatever little they know. The students are at home watching Sanju Baba kill bad guys, and Jon Abraham seduce bad girls. The mullahs are making speeches they don't understand, to crowds that aren't listening, until they bring on the hate. Then everybody listens. The uncles and aunties think cheap Broadway rip-offs with racy costumes constitute a culture renaissance. Little girls in rural Pakistan meanwhile are being traded by remorseless jirgas, in the name of honour. The culture vultures hate Arabic, love Punjabi, and are addicted to broken English. The hawks want beef, the doves want bhindi. And bankers want to loan Pakistan more money to finance the whole rot all over again. It's time for Pakistan to start spending its money on people servicing, instead of debt servicing. Bigger and more successful countries have done this before including Indonesia, Russia, and Argentina. Pakistan loves to ape other countries. Now is its chance. Time to default.
Pakistan is not going to default, because nobody will let it. That's too bad. Don't let the "economists" scare you. Default sounds like a dark, scary, doomsday scenario. Sovereign default sounds worse, like God's curse itself. It is not. "Sovereign" is the fancy term for country, used by the same loan sharks that milk pensioners to fatten their year-end bonuses (and who brought you Wall Street Meltdown 2008). Sovereign default is simply a country not making its loan repayments on time. It has happened to plenty of countries. They are all still around. Ex-bankers and former IMF employees will never advise Pakistan to default because to do so would be counter-intuitive. It would be like expecting the PPP to undertake land reforms, or the Jamaat-e-Islami to be consistent about anything. Advising Pakistan to default would represent an existential crisis worse than sovereign default. People would be forced to revisit the premise of their entire careers. We can't have that. So instead, we have experts from all around the world wringing their hands, loosening their ties and extolling the virtues of the "bitter pill" of yet another IMF programme. The purpose? To avoid the "dreaded" default, at all costs. Why is default such a "scary" thing, and why do countries go to extraordinary lengths to avoid default? Countries try to avoid default for four reasons. First, countries try to avoid default to save the country's reputation as a borrower in good standing--which means that they want to continue to borrow at rates that are favourable to them. Second, countries try to avoid default to save their ability to participate in international trade freely--which means they fear having sanctions imposed on them for being poor managers of their affairs. Third, countries try to avoid default to protect domestic banking and financial system--which means in essence that they want to protect the rich, because there aren't many poor folks with bank accounts. And finally, the fourth reason countries try to avoid default is to save the government of the day from the disgrace of having defaulted. Eduardo Borensztein and Ugo Panizza published an IMF working paper earlier this month that exposes one of the worst kept secrets in international development. They conclude that among all four of these reasons to avoid default, the most compelling, based on the evidence, is politics. They conclude that "The political consequences of a debt crisis seem to be particularly dire for incumbent governments and finance ministers". In short, governments choose not to default because it is the politically expedient thing to do. The actual economic costs of defaulting, Borenzstein and Panizza conclude, are simply not that high. Moreover, another paper earlier this year (by yet another IMF economist, Ali Alichi), suggests that the only real reason that countries repay the sovereign debt that they owe is to continue to be able to borrow money. In short, Pakistan is trying to avoid defaulting so that the PPP government can stay in power, and so that while it stays in power, it can continue to borrow money. The real question here is: where is all the money going and why does Pakistan need to keep borrowing it? Most of the money is going to debt-servicing and to defence. The traditional response to unsustainable expenditure in Pakistan is to call for a cut in defence spending, while continuing to find a way to pay off Pakistan's loans. No one ever actually explains what they mean by cutting defence spending, which is why the conversation begins with a request to cut the defence budget, meanders into the patriotism of those demanding the cut, and ends with a straight-faced refusal. No one expects Pakistan to compromise its national security, but it is not unreasonable to explore more efficient ways of securing the nation and the national interest. Far from a national conversation about spending priorities however, no one has gone so far as to even suggest a more traditional and hawkish view, for example, that the war on terror being waged by Pakistan's soldiers needs all the financing it can get, and that Pakistan's debtors will have to wait. An even more refreshing case to make would be to suggest that both debt servicing and national security are major drags on current and future generations, and that they represent much lower priorities than building infrastructure, fixing the police and delivering real education. What would a Pakistani government that was committed to those priorities look like? For starters it would stop hiring poorly qualified political workers to stack the deck for future election campaigns. Forget hiring another ten thousand jiyalas as teachers, to ruin another generation of children. Let's face it, Pakistan cannot grow teachers on trees, it doesn't have any teachers. It has to go out and hire the best Indonesian, Turkish, and Korean teachers. It has to bring them to Pakistan and put them to work. Pay them real salaries. Hire the Emiratis that have designed Sheikh Mohammad's infrastructure revolution to do the same thing to Karachi. Then go out and hire every willing CBM, FAST, GIKI, and IBA graduate out there, and make cops and municipal administrators out of them. Take ten of those supercops, give them Blackberrys, night-vision goggles, Humvees and some ammo and put them outside every school. Forget the entourages. Protect the schools. Take the municipal administrators and tell them to get running water to those schools. If there's no well, and no groundwater, teach them how to negotiate deals, so they can buy truckloads of mineral water for the students, and their mothers. Get those kids and their families some clean water. Make sure there are nurses and doctors at each school. Pay every Aga Khan University Medical School graduate twice what they would make as residents at Mount Sinai or Beth Israel. Teach the kids their native languages, drop the grammatically dreadful and aesthetically murderous fake American accents and bring back the Pakistani accent to film, television, radio and to dinner parties. That's the kind of expenditure that would explain indebting future generations of Pakistanis. It would explain deepening the pool of debt that Pakistan is drowning in. It would explain the helplessness currently being feigned by economic and political policy makers. In short, if Pakistan was borrowing money to pay for this kind of a social program, it would be hard to argue against it. Instead, Pakistan is borrowing money to throw it into the same black hole that the money has been going into for at least a generation now. What has Pakistan got to show for almost forty years of sustained debt growth? Illiterate fanatics who can't pronounce the name of God are taking over Swat because the courts don't work. Drug lords and criminals posing as religious vigilantes are taking over NWFP because the cops don't work, can't work, and aren't allowed to work. The water in the taps all over the country is toxic. The teachers at the school can barely read. The ones that can spend more time in Lahore, Peshawar, Quetta and Karachi, at the civil secretariat looking for a transfer, than teaching their students whatever little they know. The students are at home watching Sanju Baba kill bad guys, and Jon Abraham seduce bad girls. The mullahs are making speeches they don't understand, to crowds that aren't listening, until they bring on the hate. Then everybody listens. The uncles and aunties think cheap Broadway rip-offs with racy costumes constitute a culture renaissance. Little girls in rural Pakistan meanwhile are being traded by remorseless jirgas, in the name of honour. The culture vultures hate Arabic, love Punjabi, and are addicted to broken English. The hawks want beef, the doves want bhindi. And bankers want to loan Pakistan more money to finance the whole rot all over again. It's time for Pakistan to start spending its money on people servicing, instead of debt servicing. Bigger and more successful countries have done this before including Indonesia, Russia, and Argentina. Pakistan loves to ape other countries. Now is its chance. Time to default.
Monday, October 20, 2008
Bollywood Craze
A Pakistani teenager's craze for a career in Bollywood has landed him in an Indian jail and his worried parents are appealing for his release on humanitarian grounds.
Nasir Sultan, a Class 10 student and a diehard fan of the Bollywood superstar Shahrukh Khan, crossed over to India illegally to try and join the film industry. After reaching Punjab in India, he called his parents in the North West Frontier Province to say he was in the neighbouring country. Fifteen minutes later his parents got another call to say that their son had been arrested. Sultan's parents, who hail from Chukiatan, a small town of Dir district in NWFP, are now running from pillar to post to secure his release. Like most Pakistani boys of his age, Sultan was an avid Bollywood fan and was fascinated by the many stunts in Hindi films that he hoped to excel at too. On August 16, Sultan left home for school wearing his uniform and carrying his schoolbag but instead crossed the border.
Two days later, his father Sultan Zareen, who works at a petrol pump, got a call from Sultan, who said he was on his way to Mumbai. This was followed soon after by the news of his arrest.
Sultan is being held in Faridkot Jail for the past two months. "I don't know what to do to secure his release as he is in another country where I have no influence or resources to use for winning his release," Zareen told The News daily. Zareen said his wife was depressed and the Indian Government should release his son on humanitarian ground.
Nasir Sultan, a Class 10 student and a diehard fan of the Bollywood superstar Shahrukh Khan, crossed over to India illegally to try and join the film industry. After reaching Punjab in India, he called his parents in the North West Frontier Province to say he was in the neighbouring country. Fifteen minutes later his parents got another call to say that their son had been arrested. Sultan's parents, who hail from Chukiatan, a small town of Dir district in NWFP, are now running from pillar to post to secure his release. Like most Pakistani boys of his age, Sultan was an avid Bollywood fan and was fascinated by the many stunts in Hindi films that he hoped to excel at too. On August 16, Sultan left home for school wearing his uniform and carrying his schoolbag but instead crossed the border.
Two days later, his father Sultan Zareen, who works at a petrol pump, got a call from Sultan, who said he was on his way to Mumbai. This was followed soon after by the news of his arrest.
Sultan is being held in Faridkot Jail for the past two months. "I don't know what to do to secure his release as he is in another country where I have no influence or resources to use for winning his release," Zareen told The News daily. Zareen said his wife was depressed and the Indian Government should release his son on humanitarian ground.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Canada Votes
Canadians have chosen "slow and steady," giving Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Conservatives a tighter hold on minority government as the country braces for a looming economic downturn. Harper, 49, was able to make vital gains in Ontario, including big victories in the 905 region, but campaign missteps in Quebec kept his long-sought majority agonizingly out of reach and leaves him facing a divided Parliament. But last night, Harper said Conservatives "hold out our hand to all members of Parliament" in order to "protect Canada's economy.
"This is a time for us all to put aside political differences and partisan considerations and to work cooperatively for the benefit of Canada," Harper told supporters at Calgary's Telus Convention Centre. The night proved a bitter disappointment for Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion, 53, who failed to sell voters on his leadership or his controversial carbon tax and now faces an almost certain challenge to his leadership.
Dion told supporters early today that he will co-operate with the government in dealing with the economy. "We Liberals will do our part responsibly to make sure this Parliament works," he said.
"I assured (Harper) that my top priority will be the economy."
Liberals lost seats across Atlantic Canada and in the one-time stronghold of Ontario, where they gave up seats to the Conservatives in ridings such as Oakville and Halton, where high-profile Liberal Garth Turner lost to Conservative Lisa Raitt.
Dion, in his first campaign as a party leader, said he wouldn't quit if Liberals lost the election. But Tuesday night's result – the worst showing for the party in at least 20 years – makes it doubtful that Liberals are willing to give Dion, who struggled with English and his ability to connect with voters, a second chance.
Liberals Bob Rae and Michael Ignatieff – Dion's rivals for the party leadership – both won their Toronto seats last night, ensuring that leadership speculation remains alive.
NDP Leader Jack Layton, 58, improved his party's standings, winning seats in Newfoundland and Northern Ontario. Layton campaigned to be prime minister, but in reality aspired to replace the Liberals as official Opposition. He lost on both counts, but yesterday's results give the NDP a stronger voice in Parliament.
"We didn't quite get the gold medal this election but we did give it our best shot," Layton told supporters gathered last night at a club on Toronto's waterfront. And he noted that the election did not give Harper a blank cheque. "Canadians have elected a minority Parliament. No party has a mandate to implement an agenda without agreement from the other parties," said Layton, whose wife Olivia Chow won in the riding of Trinity-Spadina.
In Quebec, Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe, 61, turned around his campaign and held onto seats, thanks to the Conservative missteps in the province, especially a proposed crackdown on young offenders, as well as arts cuts.
The result marks Canada's third minority government in four years. And it means the Conservatives will continue to face three progressive-leaning parties in Parliament, which could force Harper to strike a more conciliatory approach to his dealings with political rivals.
It could also mean that a question mark hangs over a Conservative campaign pledge to crack down on teen offenders, given the strong opposition to it from the other parties.
What started out as a sleeper campaign turned dramatic as wild stock market swings, global bank failures and recession fears thrust the economy into the spotlight.
In the end, voters opted for Harper's modest platform. But they kept the Conservatives on a short leash as they were unwilling again to trust them with a majority government, something that had seemed within easy reach during the 37-day campaign.
The Prime Minister gambled with his election call, opting to go to the polls a full year before the date set by his party's own legislation for the next vote. He told Canadians that Parliament was at an impasse and that he needed a new mandate from voters.
While Harper was able to deliver new seats at the expense of the Liberals – and make critical gains in Ontario – the result is sure to fuel some questions within Conservative ranks about Harper's leadership. For the third time he has failed to deliver a majority, despite the best possible scenario this time – a weak rival trying to sell voters on a new tax.
Conservative cabinet minister Diane Ablonczy insisted the party would be happy with the results, even though it fell about a dozen seats short of the 155 seats needed for a majority.
"We're very pleased with the very strong mandate we received tonight. I think you'll see a Parliament that works much better going forward," she told CBC News Tuesday night.
Harper, who must form a new cabinet in the coming weeks, is already facing opposition calls to return Parliament quickly to deal with the economic crisis and bring forward an economic update on the state of the country's financial books. Green Leader Elizabeth May, 54, fell short as well last night, losing to her Conservative rival Peter MacKay in the Nova Scotia riding of Central Nova.
The Greens failed to elect any of their candidates. Still, May's high-profile run gave new publicity to the party, thanks largely to her successful fight to win a spot in the televised leaders' debates, where she impressed many Canadians with her performance.
Harper launched the election on Sept. 7 determined to frame the ballot box issue as a question of whom Canadians should trust to lead the nation in troubled times.
In the end, the economy – and stomach-churning stock market tumbles that saw the Toronto index plunged more than 20 per cent during the campaign – stole his thunder and became the story of the campaign as all leaders pitched themselves as the best stewards to lead the nation.
The Prime Minister preached a "steady-as-she-goes" approach but Canadians scolded Harper for his initial lack of empathy for their worries over sagging investment portfolios and the future of their jobs. At one point, he even said there were some "great buying opportunities" as a result of the downtown, a comment that drew complaints that he was tone-deaf to the concerns of Canadians. The opposition parties jumped on the economy, charging that Harper's modest platform was a "do-nothing" recipe. Dion used the French-language televised debate to release his own five-point plan to bolster the economy. Layton drew attention to the loss of good-paying manufacturing jobs. As well, Conservative cuts to arts and culture funding – and Harper's dismissive response – cost the party precious seats in Quebec, where the Conservatives had carefully courted voters in the hopes of making gains.
The result now ensures that the threat of another election will continue to hang over the nation.
http://www.thestar.com/federalelection/article/517664
"This is a time for us all to put aside political differences and partisan considerations and to work cooperatively for the benefit of Canada," Harper told supporters at Calgary's Telus Convention Centre. The night proved a bitter disappointment for Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion, 53, who failed to sell voters on his leadership or his controversial carbon tax and now faces an almost certain challenge to his leadership.
Dion told supporters early today that he will co-operate with the government in dealing with the economy. "We Liberals will do our part responsibly to make sure this Parliament works," he said.
"I assured (Harper) that my top priority will be the economy."
Liberals lost seats across Atlantic Canada and in the one-time stronghold of Ontario, where they gave up seats to the Conservatives in ridings such as Oakville and Halton, where high-profile Liberal Garth Turner lost to Conservative Lisa Raitt.
Dion, in his first campaign as a party leader, said he wouldn't quit if Liberals lost the election. But Tuesday night's result – the worst showing for the party in at least 20 years – makes it doubtful that Liberals are willing to give Dion, who struggled with English and his ability to connect with voters, a second chance.
Liberals Bob Rae and Michael Ignatieff – Dion's rivals for the party leadership – both won their Toronto seats last night, ensuring that leadership speculation remains alive.
NDP Leader Jack Layton, 58, improved his party's standings, winning seats in Newfoundland and Northern Ontario. Layton campaigned to be prime minister, but in reality aspired to replace the Liberals as official Opposition. He lost on both counts, but yesterday's results give the NDP a stronger voice in Parliament.
"We didn't quite get the gold medal this election but we did give it our best shot," Layton told supporters gathered last night at a club on Toronto's waterfront. And he noted that the election did not give Harper a blank cheque. "Canadians have elected a minority Parliament. No party has a mandate to implement an agenda without agreement from the other parties," said Layton, whose wife Olivia Chow won in the riding of Trinity-Spadina.
In Quebec, Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe, 61, turned around his campaign and held onto seats, thanks to the Conservative missteps in the province, especially a proposed crackdown on young offenders, as well as arts cuts.
The result marks Canada's third minority government in four years. And it means the Conservatives will continue to face three progressive-leaning parties in Parliament, which could force Harper to strike a more conciliatory approach to his dealings with political rivals.
It could also mean that a question mark hangs over a Conservative campaign pledge to crack down on teen offenders, given the strong opposition to it from the other parties.
What started out as a sleeper campaign turned dramatic as wild stock market swings, global bank failures and recession fears thrust the economy into the spotlight.
In the end, voters opted for Harper's modest platform. But they kept the Conservatives on a short leash as they were unwilling again to trust them with a majority government, something that had seemed within easy reach during the 37-day campaign.
The Prime Minister gambled with his election call, opting to go to the polls a full year before the date set by his party's own legislation for the next vote. He told Canadians that Parliament was at an impasse and that he needed a new mandate from voters.
While Harper was able to deliver new seats at the expense of the Liberals – and make critical gains in Ontario – the result is sure to fuel some questions within Conservative ranks about Harper's leadership. For the third time he has failed to deliver a majority, despite the best possible scenario this time – a weak rival trying to sell voters on a new tax.
Conservative cabinet minister Diane Ablonczy insisted the party would be happy with the results, even though it fell about a dozen seats short of the 155 seats needed for a majority.
"We're very pleased with the very strong mandate we received tonight. I think you'll see a Parliament that works much better going forward," she told CBC News Tuesday night.
Harper, who must form a new cabinet in the coming weeks, is already facing opposition calls to return Parliament quickly to deal with the economic crisis and bring forward an economic update on the state of the country's financial books. Green Leader Elizabeth May, 54, fell short as well last night, losing to her Conservative rival Peter MacKay in the Nova Scotia riding of Central Nova.
The Greens failed to elect any of their candidates. Still, May's high-profile run gave new publicity to the party, thanks largely to her successful fight to win a spot in the televised leaders' debates, where she impressed many Canadians with her performance.
Harper launched the election on Sept. 7 determined to frame the ballot box issue as a question of whom Canadians should trust to lead the nation in troubled times.
In the end, the economy – and stomach-churning stock market tumbles that saw the Toronto index plunged more than 20 per cent during the campaign – stole his thunder and became the story of the campaign as all leaders pitched themselves as the best stewards to lead the nation.
The Prime Minister preached a "steady-as-she-goes" approach but Canadians scolded Harper for his initial lack of empathy for their worries over sagging investment portfolios and the future of their jobs. At one point, he even said there were some "great buying opportunities" as a result of the downtown, a comment that drew complaints that he was tone-deaf to the concerns of Canadians. The opposition parties jumped on the economy, charging that Harper's modest platform was a "do-nothing" recipe. Dion used the French-language televised debate to release his own five-point plan to bolster the economy. Layton drew attention to the loss of good-paying manufacturing jobs. As well, Conservative cuts to arts and culture funding – and Harper's dismissive response – cost the party precious seats in Quebec, where the Conservatives had carefully courted voters in the hopes of making gains.
The result now ensures that the threat of another election will continue to hang over the nation.
http://www.thestar.com/federalelection/article/517664
NRI wife paraded ..
JALANDHAR: In a shocking and brutal retribution for being "seen" with a man, a 30-year-old wife of an NRI was allegedly paraded naked in front of her children, mother-in-law and relatives as a bunch of angry villagers cheered on while some also recorded it on video.
The woman, in a complaint filed with police on Tuesday, said she had merely called a painter to her house as it was the festive season and she wanted a whitewash done. "But the sarpanch and some other villagers barged into my house and not only beat me up but also captured my image on their cellphones as they paraded me naked in front of my two children and relatives," the residentof Atta said.
Sarpanch Lakhbir Kumar is known to her and a few are even related to her. Dismissing her allegations, he said he played moral police and said a villagerhad seen her through "a cracked window" in a compromising position with the painter.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Jalandhar_NRI_wife_paraded_naked/articleshow/3596874.cms
The woman, in a complaint filed with police on Tuesday, said she had merely called a painter to her house as it was the festive season and she wanted a whitewash done. "But the sarpanch and some other villagers barged into my house and not only beat me up but also captured my image on their cellphones as they paraded me naked in front of my two children and relatives," the residentof Atta said.
Sarpanch Lakhbir Kumar is known to her and a few are even related to her. Dismissing her allegations, he said he played moral police and said a villagerhad seen her through "a cracked window" in a compromising position with the painter.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Jalandhar_NRI_wife_paraded_naked/articleshow/3596874.cms
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Rioters burn Muslim family of 6 to death in south India
APPublished: October 12, 2008, 14:03
Hyderabad: Rioters in southern India killed six members of a Muslim family by setting fire to their home after earlier clashes between Hindus and Muslims left four others dead and 15 injured in the same village, officials said on Sunday. Tensions have been high in Vatoli village since Friday when violence and looting erupted between the two sides, leading to four deaths, said Andhra Pradesh state Home Minister K. Jana Reddy. Authorities imposed a curfew on Friday, but were unable to stop the deadly arson attack, which apparently occurred before dawn on Sunday, Reddy said. "It is a beastly and barbaric act," Reddy told reporters. "Police are investigating the case and we will catch the culprits." Three children, including a 2-year-old, were among the six burnt to death, he said.
Vatoli is in Adilabad district, 275 kilometres north of the state capital of Hyderabad. Muslim leaders called for better protection for minorities, especially in rural areas. "Despite our repeated pleas and appeals, the government has failed to provide protection to the Muslims who live in remote areas and who have a very small population in those places," said Asaduddin Owaisi, a member of the lower house of the national Parliament
Hyderabad: Rioters in southern India killed six members of a Muslim family by setting fire to their home after earlier clashes between Hindus and Muslims left four others dead and 15 injured in the same village, officials said on Sunday. Tensions have been high in Vatoli village since Friday when violence and looting erupted between the two sides, leading to four deaths, said Andhra Pradesh state Home Minister K. Jana Reddy. Authorities imposed a curfew on Friday, but were unable to stop the deadly arson attack, which apparently occurred before dawn on Sunday, Reddy said. "It is a beastly and barbaric act," Reddy told reporters. "Police are investigating the case and we will catch the culprits." Three children, including a 2-year-old, were among the six burnt to death, he said.
Vatoli is in Adilabad district, 275 kilometres north of the state capital of Hyderabad. Muslim leaders called for better protection for minorities, especially in rural areas. "Despite our repeated pleas and appeals, the government has failed to provide protection to the Muslims who live in remote areas and who have a very small population in those places," said Asaduddin Owaisi, a member of the lower house of the national Parliament
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
